ISSUE NO. 05
Teach AI How
You Decide.
Do not just tell AI what you want.
Give AI the principles behind your decisions. Your rules will be different from mine, but they should be explicit.
QUICK VERSION
READ THIS IF YOU ONLY HAVE TWO MINUTES
Most people tell AI
what they want.
Very few tell it how they judge whether an idea is good.
At ONE Blades, major decisions can be tested against five questions:
Does this benefit skaters, coaches, parents, or creators?
Does this strengthen inline figure skating?
Does this protect creator economics?
Does this respect the phase model?
Could this decision be explained publicly without spin?
That is far more useful than simply asking:
Is this a good idea?
The AI can now evaluate the idea against the rules of the actual company.
Your framework will be different.
Create three to five questions that reflect what really matters in your decisions.
Also tell AI:
- What has already been rejected.
- What is non-negotiable.
- What evidence would justify reopening a decision.
Good personalization is not only
“know me.”
It is
“understand how I decide.”
THE WHOLE IDEA
Teach AI the criteria behind your judgment.
Then it can evaluate ideas against what actually matters to you.
GO DEEPER
The difference
is often criteria.
The same opportunity can be good for one person and terrible for another.
The difference is often not information.
It is criteria.
A real
ONE example.
Imagine a manufacturer becomes excited about a future product idea and wants ONE to move faster.
Generic business logic might say:
There is momentum.
Capitalize on it.
Move now.
But ONE has a phase model.
Phase 1 remains focused on EDGE and inline skating.
Future products do not become public simply because someone else is enthusiastic.
Manufacturer enthusiasm
is information,
not direction.
The AI needs to know that.
Otherwise, it may repeatedly recommend decisions that look commercially exciting but create mission drift.
The ONE
Five-Question Test.
ONE uses five questions for major decisions.
They are powerful because they convert broad principles into something testable.
Does this benefit skaters, coaches, parents, or creators?
This protects Skater First.
Does this strengthen inline figure skating?
This protects the mission.
Does this protect creator economics?
This prevents growth ideas from quietly weakening the creator model.
Does this respect the phase model?
This stops distraction masquerading as opportunity.
Could this decision be explained publicly without spin?
This protects honesty.
Now the AI has a filter.
Build your own
decision test.
Do not copy ONE's questions unless they genuinely fit your life.
Find your own.
A FREELANCER
- Does this work pay enough to justify the time?
- Does it strengthen the portfolio I want?
- Do I respect the client?
- Will it create recurring stress?
- Would I still want it if nobody else knew I got the job?
A PARENT CONSIDERING A MAJOR PURCHASE
- Can we comfortably afford it?
- Does it solve a real problem?
- Will we still use it in a year?
- What are we giving up to pay for it?
- Are we buying it because we need it or because we are excited today?